2019-02-27 21:01:58 | <franktrampe> Hello, everybody. |
2019-02-27 21:02:42 | <franktrampe> Just a reminder to skim the SPI letter so that we can talk about it later in the meeting. |
2019-02-27 21:03:52 | <houz> hey |
2019-02-27 21:04:34 | <houz> that one? Application_Letter_20190226_2.pdf |
2019-02-27 21:04:56 | <franktrampe> Yes. |
2019-02-27 21:05:42 | <pippin> hi |
2019-02-27 21:05:57 | <franktrampe> There is an in-person SPI board meeting this Friday, and we can get on the agenda if we get the letter in by then. |
2019-02-27 21:06:27 | <houz> sgtm |
2019-02-27 21:07:10 | <franktrampe> The arrangement is totally non-exclusive, so, if it turns out to be non-useful, we simply don't use it. Sort of a win-win. |
2019-02-27 21:07:49 | <franktrampe> I'd encourage others to read the SPI associated projects page and the draft letter so that we can hold a formal vote at the end of the meeting. |
2019-02-27 21:08:32 | <houz> we also need some (corporate) sponsorship info on the website |
2019-02-27 21:09:11 | <franktrampe> That brings up another question. Logistically speaking, did we ever reach an arrangement with K8 to handle global funds beyond this year? |
2019-02-27 21:09:29 | <a-l-e> hi... i don't think that a formal vote should be done in irc. way too few people around. |
2019-02-27 21:09:51 | <franktrampe> Yes, but nobody ever votes on the mailing list either. |
2019-02-27 21:10:15 | <a-l-e> still, if there is a vote it should be first announced on the ML in advance. |
2019-02-27 21:10:21 | <franktrampe> It seemed like it took a month of hammering last time we held an asynchronous vote. |
2019-02-27 21:10:46 | <franktrampe> In this case, it's a highly inconsequential matter with no downside, and I did announce on the mailing list. |
2019-02-27 21:11:10 | <franktrampe> I'm happy to hold another mailing list vote tomorrow, but we need at least to have a consensus here before we do that. |
2019-02-27 21:12:01 | <franktrampe> For what it's worth, this is just an application. We are not obliged to accept the SPI partnership if the application is accepted. |
2019-02-27 21:12:32 | <franktrampe> We might even hold that it's already approved under the vote to pursue the partnership. |
2019-02-27 21:12:53 | <franktrampe> I just want to make sure that we don't miss this opportunity and let it slide another year. |
2019-02-27 21:13:56 | <houz> i'm with frank there |
2019-02-27 21:13:59 | * Aude_K8 (uid337527@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-wvuwmssnryhsyvsp) has joined |
2019-02-27 21:14:11 | <houz> hey Aude_K8 |
2019-02-27 21:14:20 | <Aude_K8> hi, sorry for the delay |
2019-02-27 21:14:33 | <franktrampe> No worries. Just discussing the SPI application. |
2019-02-27 21:15:22 | <franktrampe> We have a Friday deadline, and, out of caution, we want to hold a vote on the application and the liaison appointment. |
2019-02-27 21:15:51 | <franktrampe> I'm happy with an IRC vote, but a-l-e would like to defer to the mailing list. |
2019-02-27 21:16:01 | <pippin> Aude_K8: thanks a lot for putting together the draft schedule :) |
2019-02-27 21:16:35 | <franktrampe> My proposal is that we hammer out something that we all like today and have a mailing list vote with a cut-off tomorrow at some time. |
2019-02-27 21:17:00 | <franktrampe> But let's do local organization stuff first and get back to that later. |
2019-02-27 21:18:10 | <houz> did everyone look over the proposed schedule? |
2019-02-27 21:18:22 | <houz> link is https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TJF4_w09xCkG6aOfZQxsyw7WzYwrfGX6R9e9dnZXj2M/edit#gid=0 |
2019-02-27 21:18:42 | <houz> (yes, i pasted that in public irc on purpose) |
2019-02-27 21:19:22 | <pippin> franktrampe: a formal decision by "lgm" is only really possible to do at lgm - besides todays meeting is about schedule planning and is not a generic lgm-meeting |
2019-02-27 21:19:25 | <a-l-e> (btw, is the 30.5 an holiday in saarland, too?) |
2019-02-27 21:19:35 | <houz> yes |
2019-02-27 21:19:37 | <Aude_K8> the schedule is tight, but we have a lot of talks and workshops. |
2019-02-27 21:20:05 | <gingercoons_> in general, it looks like a pretty nice schedule so far |
2019-02-27 21:20:48 | <pippin> Aude_K8: what type thoughts have gone into ordering of talks/clusters of talks thus far? |
2019-02-27 21:21:05 | <a-l-e> it's a bit hard to say, since i only see part of the title + the "track"... |
2019-02-27 21:21:21 | <a-l-e> for the beginning, i'm not 100% sure that the first two talks are the best for starting. |
2019-02-27 21:21:26 | <houz> we put the education ones to friday morning so that (in theory) teachers from the region could come |
2019-02-27 21:21:32 | <pippin> a-l-e: agree |
2019-02-27 21:21:43 | <gingercoons_> another +1 on a-l-e's point |
2019-02-27 21:22:06 | <Aude_K8> and we have people who just can be there on one or two days, so we put them where it suits for them |
2019-02-27 21:22:12 | <gingercoons_> usability is a newish topic for LGM, and it might be nice to put it a little later in the schedule |
2019-02-27 21:22:14 | <houz> right |
2019-02-27 21:22:36 | <a-l-e> we have everybody in the room for the state of the LG... it's one of the best spots and the talks (most of all the second one) seems a bit week to me. |
2019-02-27 21:22:47 | <Aude_K8> and we tried to have talks with similer topics together, and no workshops /meetings with similar topics at the same time |
2019-02-27 21:23:15 | <a-l-e> are all talks in there? |
2019-02-27 21:23:24 | <houz> yes |
2019-02-27 21:23:37 | <houz> besides one who never replied to mails |
2019-02-27 21:23:44 | <a-l-e> probono? |
2019-02-27 21:23:49 | <a-l-e> (appimage?) |
2019-02-27 21:23:55 | <houz> no |
2019-02-27 21:24:07 | <a-l-e> well, he was not refused, so it should be in, imo |
2019-02-27 21:24:20 | <a-l-e> he is very late with replying, but he finally replied on monday. |
2019-02-27 21:24:22 | <Aude_K8> dylan c |
2019-02-27 21:24:25 | <houz> probono is sun morning |
2019-02-27 21:24:29 | <pippin> a note that my own submisisons 'Commandlines, CMYK .. etc' would work better if it is *before* the 'GEGL and GIMP non-destructive editing' - which is formulated to discuss/elaborate discuss some of the future consequences of the talk |
2019-02-27 21:25:06 | <Aude_K8> but there are also 3-4 other people where you were waiting for an answer, Ale. Did you get them? |
2019-02-27 21:25:08 | <a-l-e> "liberate books" should be a LT, not a FT... |
2019-02-27 21:25:29 | <a-l-e> some of them, yes. other no. |
2019-02-27 21:25:37 | <a-l-e> it's marked in the google doc... |
2019-02-27 21:25:54 | <boud> question: last year I did the State of Libre Graphics. Is there another speaker, or should I keep in mind that I might have to do it again? |
2019-02-27 21:26:11 | <pippin> we should also have more than one lightning-talk session, and hope to get as many lightning talks submitted at the event as before. |
2019-02-27 21:26:35 | <a-l-e> Aude_K8, one really failed ot reply, and it's the very first. i think that all other have had a reply. |
2019-02-27 21:26:51 | <houz> boud: you did that exceptionally well, would you be willing to do it again? |
2019-02-27 21:27:01 | <houz> pippin: there are 2 lt sessions |
2019-02-27 21:27:09 | <boud> sure, but if there's a more regular person to do it, I don't want to put myself forward |
2019-02-27 21:27:26 | <pippin> ah yes, there is one on saturday as well |
2019-02-27 21:27:33 | <a-l-e> sat 1.6, "liberate books": iirc, it has been confirmed as a LT, not a FT... |
2019-02-27 21:27:35 | <houz> what do you mean, more regular? you are lgm inventory :-D |
2019-02-27 21:28:31 | <boud> It was ages between Madrid and Sevilla, and in between I never could attend, as far as I remember. |
2019-02-27 21:28:53 | <gingercoons_> is the distinction between workshop and BoF going to get re-introduced for the actual published schedule? for some of these, it's important for expectation management |
2019-02-27 21:30:03 | <houz> Aude_K8 just called me, her computer is acting strangely, she's not ignoring us :-) |
2019-02-27 21:30:53 | <houz> i would do the workshop/bof differentation, yes |
2019-02-27 21:31:06 | <houz> but for scheduling them it's the same, right? |
2019-02-27 21:31:26 | <a-l-e> should we put the comments in the sheet? |
2019-02-27 21:31:43 | <Aude_K8> I am back :-) |
2019-02-27 21:31:51 | <gingercoons_> I believe so. I just wanted us to be sure that it doesn't accidentally get collapsed during the translation from one spreadsheet to the next :) |
2019-02-27 21:31:58 | <houz> that would be good. then we can go through it tomorrow and incorporate the changes |
2019-02-27 21:32:05 | <Aude_K8> yes comments in the sheet would be helpful. Just let me do a copy |
2019-02-27 21:33:16 | <Aude_K8> copy is there. So we can work in it |
2019-02-27 21:33:39 | <houz> i also added comment columns to the tables |
2019-02-27 21:35:44 | <Aude_K8> @a-l-e I have some questions to your feedbacks in the main sheet. Can we go through them to decide for propositions which are unclear? Like Number 10? |
2019-02-27 21:35:56 | <pippin> perhaps there should be another/longer orga meeting than 50min just before the goodbye session? |
2019-02-27 21:36:32 | <a-l-e> orga meeting at the end are not the best imo. |
2019-02-27 21:36:53 | <pippin> franktrampe: have you submitted a workshop/bof for SPI membership? |
2019-02-27 21:36:55 | * pippin hides |
2019-02-27 21:37:17 | <franktrampe> No. I was planning to cover that at the organizational meeting. |
2019-02-27 21:37:25 | <gingercoons_> maybe we could try to fit an additional org meeting into one of the lunch breaks? |
2019-02-27 21:37:30 | <franktrampe> Fine with me. |
2019-02-27 21:37:31 | <Aude_K8> can the orga meeting be during the lunch break |
2019-02-27 21:38:12 | <Aude_K8> on which day will we have most of the persons? thursday? friday? |
2019-02-27 21:38:45 | <a-l-e> Aude_K8, i just got a mail from 10 and he says that he will try to do a good talk : - ) |
2019-02-27 21:38:54 | <Aude_K8> If I remember right, a few people wrote they won't be there during the week-end |
2019-02-27 21:38:59 | <gingercoons_> Aude_K8: I'd guess Friday |
2019-02-27 21:39:25 | <Aude_K8> @a-l-e yes I spoke with him yesterday and he would really like to do one |
2019-02-27 21:39:58 | <a-l-e> i think that the program he is creating is really interesting. |
2019-02-27 21:40:01 | <pippin> but a orga/wrap-up/recruit helpers for next iteration, before the closing, for a shorter stretch than 50min, might be a good idea |
2019-02-27 21:40:26 | <pippin> (in addition to a lunch organisation meeting) |
2019-02-27 21:41:01 | <a-l-e> but he admitted that he was looking for contributors... and now does not have a good new plan yet... but you are confident and i'd really like him to present something good! |
2019-02-27 21:41:54 | <Aude_K8> @pippin: you mean a meeting instead of sunday afternoon or one extra? |
2019-02-27 21:42:21 | <pippin> Aude_K8: both |
2019-02-27 21:42:33 | <Aude_K8> @a-l-e I can only say he is motivated. Houz knows more about his competences |
2019-02-27 21:42:54 | <Aude_K8> @pippin ok I squeeze it somewhere in the schedule |
2019-02-27 21:42:55 | <a-l-e> i've looked at his code and it looks really well written. |
2019-02-27 21:43:13 | <a-l-e> and concerning the features, the screenshots are promising : - ) |
2019-02-27 21:43:31 | <Aude_K8> should we give him a chance with a full talk? |
2019-02-27 21:44:12 | <a-l-e> he is confident to manage 15 to 20 mins. |
2019-02-27 21:45:05 | <Aude_K8> For K8 it is fine for us if he does a full talk |
2019-02-27 21:45:20 | <houz> i will try to drag #10 to the inkscape hackfest to get to know those people, maybe that will help shape his talk a little, too |
2019-02-27 21:46:01 | <Aude_K8> ok for everyone? |
2019-02-27 21:46:07 | <houz> yes for me |
2019-02-27 21:46:15 | <a-l-e> yep |
2019-02-27 21:46:26 | <houz> i added time constraints to the comments so we don't accidentally schedule talks where the speaker is not available |
2019-02-27 21:47:08 | <Aude_K8> another question: #33 would really like to have a full talk and not 2 LT. What do you mean? |
2019-02-27 21:47:19 | <houz> so 5 is a lt, that gives us a free slot either for an orga meeting or one of the two new ones |
2019-02-27 21:48:01 | <Aude_K8> We planed #33 in the schedule as a full talk so it would not be a problem of time... |
2019-02-27 21:48:24 | <houz> i would give him his full slot |
2019-02-27 21:49:35 | <Aude_K8> someone against it? |
2019-02-27 21:49:37 | <a-l-e> imo, he would be a good candidate for the starting talks. |
2019-02-27 21:49:51 | <houz> jehan? |
2019-02-27 21:49:55 | <a-l-e> yep |
2019-02-27 21:49:56 | <houz> i mean, 33? |
2019-02-27 21:50:51 | <houz> agreed |
2019-02-27 21:51:09 | <Aude_K8> ok i noted that, we can switch the talks |
2019-02-27 21:51:26 | <Aude_K8> He will be happy to do a full talk |
2019-02-27 21:51:32 | <houz> we might put the whole usability cluster to another place then |
2019-02-27 21:52:24 | <Aude_K8> ok, we can check that tomorrow |
2019-02-27 21:53:10 | <Aude_K8> what do we do with the two people who did not answer (#3 and #19). Are they out? |
2019-02-27 21:53:56 | <a-l-e> #3 does not have a realy proposal and did not reply to two emails... so i guess he is out... |
2019-02-27 21:54:54 | <Aude_K8> #19 did not answer four emails. I guess he is out too |
2019-02-27 21:55:03 | <pippin> are we sure that the people expecting replies does not have overly spam sensitive mail providers? |
2019-02-27 21:55:22 | <a-l-e> #3 is gmail... |
2019-02-27 21:56:08 | <Aude_K8> #19 got mails from me and they are sometimes in the spam. Can someone else try contact him one last time? |
2019-02-27 21:56:28 | <a-l-e> for #19... it's an interesting project... but i don't really like the proposal he did. |
2019-02-27 21:56:47 | <Aude_K8> but since the 66 other persons answered me, I am not sure that it was the problem... |
2019-02-27 21:58:06 | <houz> i guess we have to make a cut somewhere, so i wouldn't wait any longer for a reply |
2019-02-27 21:58:17 | <Aude_K8> +1 |
2019-02-27 21:58:42 | <franktrampe> It's not our last LGM after all. |
2019-02-27 21:58:46 | <pippin> yes, and even without them we've got a quite packed and curated schedule coming along |
2019-02-27 21:58:55 | <houz> indeed |
2019-02-27 21:59:17 | <Aude_K8> next question is #32? Do we want to wait here? |
2019-02-27 21:59:35 | <Aude_K8> Or say he can do an LT and 2020 there will be LGM again |
2019-02-27 21:59:38 | <Aude_K8> ? |
2019-02-27 22:00:00 | <a-l-e> i'd like to wait there. |
2019-02-27 22:00:24 | <Aude_K8> did you give him a deadline? |
2019-02-27 22:01:31 | <Aude_K8> He is planed in the schedule so it is ok for me to give him one more week. But I would not like to wait longer |
2019-02-27 22:01:47 | <houz> i pinged probono in #gimp |
2019-02-27 22:02:05 | <boud> try #appimage :P |
2019-02-27 22:02:26 | <houz> done :-) |
2019-02-27 22:02:34 | <a-l-e> he was away for two weeks i guess... |
2019-02-27 22:02:49 | <a-l-e> his first reply was yesterday... |
2019-02-27 22:02:56 | <boud> spoke on #appimage today |
2019-02-27 22:03:17 | <Aude_K8> what about #49? |
2019-02-27 22:03:28 | <houz> let's give 33 a little extra time then |
2019-02-27 22:03:34 | <houz> sorry, 32 |
2019-02-27 22:03:34 | <a-l-e> he made himself a well known person, and having chatted with him (a lot), i'm confident that he will propose something good. |
2019-02-27 22:03:57 | <houz> a-l-e: who? |
2019-02-27 22:03:59 | <a-l-e> 49 has a new description and title. |
2019-02-27 22:04:11 | <a-l-e> houz, 32 |
2019-02-27 22:04:29 | <houz> right, i just wasn't sure if you spoke about 32 or 49 |
2019-02-27 22:05:21 | <Aude_K8> so 32 gets more time. 49 sent a new proposition. |
2019-02-27 22:06:11 | <Aude_K8> so 49 gets a full talk? Is it ok for everyone? |
2019-02-27 22:06:17 | <a-l-e> 49 has a high risk to be a weak talk... most of all because he does not feel confident in english (no idea what his real skills are) |
2019-02-27 22:06:34 | <a-l-e> but he will bring a topic that will probably be interesting. |
2019-02-27 22:06:55 | <houz> i'd like 49 in concert with the inkscape devs and a 1.0 release announcement :-D |
2019-02-27 22:08:13 | <Aude_K8> or only an LT? |
2019-02-27 22:08:19 | <a-l-e> he is trying hard to do something good. let's give him some karma : - ) |
2019-02-27 22:09:32 | <houz> +1 |
2019-02-27 22:11:29 | <Aude_K8> ok. 56-58: It stays we would get an updated version of the abstracts, but I do not remember why. Did anyone get something? Otherwise I would ask them again |
2019-02-27 22:12:21 | <houz> i don't remember |
2019-02-27 22:12:48 | <gingercoons_> was it because we asked for a change of format for one of the items? |
2019-02-27 22:13:21 | <Aude_K8> Maybe... I get in touch with them |
2019-02-27 22:13:49 | <Aude_K8> And last question: we have two new propositions: 68 + 69 |
2019-02-27 22:14:32 | <Aude_K8> Do we want to have them in if we have free time slots once we have worked over the schedule? |
2019-02-27 22:15:56 | <houz> why not |
2019-02-27 22:16:29 | <pippin> houz: because the deadline is long passeed..? |
2019-02-27 22:17:46 | <pippin> while lightning talks are indeed still possible and desired (the form having been online makes it seem like we could be accepting though) |
2019-02-27 22:17:59 | <Aude_K8> well, we still had the form on the website (now we shut it down). So people might not have seen that the deadline has passed |
2019-02-27 22:18:39 | <Aude_K8> the form is not online anymore since a week. so it won't come more. |
2019-02-27 22:19:44 | <Aude_K8> Otherwise we tell them that they can do a LT during LGM. And that they might get a time slot if someone is sick or does not come |
2019-02-27 22:20:31 | <gingercoons_> I think it would be reasonable to just encourage them to attend and do LTs |
2019-02-27 22:20:49 | <Aude_K8> the schedule will still be full if we do not accept them (and 68 has already a workshop) |
2019-02-27 22:20:55 | <gingercoons_> saves a lot of schedule puzzling and still gives them encouragement to participate |
2019-02-27 22:21:26 | <Aude_K8> @gingercoons +1 - and it is fair for people who participated on time |
2019-02-27 22:22:34 | <a-l-e> so, boud, you you do the state of libre graphics? |
2019-02-27 22:22:58 | <Aude_K8> For me for today all questions concerning programm and schedule are answered so we can continue to work on it. I will confirm the persons we wrote about tonight. |
2019-02-27 22:23:10 | <a-l-e> ... i've created a (growing) list of projects to be contacted... and i can help you get in touch with them. |
2019-02-27 22:23:54 | <houz> before everyone leaves, we really need a decision about sponsoring information on the website. shall we just copy&paste from last years? |
2019-02-27 22:23:56 | <a-l-e> nice, Aude_K8 |
2019-02-27 22:24:27 | <boud> a-l-e: if people want me to, sure. I will check out your list and it would be nice to have help contacting projects. |
2019-02-27 22:24:33 | <houz> https://libregraphicsmeeting.org/2016/support-lgm/sponsorship/ might be a source to take from |
2019-02-27 22:25:42 | <a-l-e> boud, the list is here: https://github.com/libregraphicsmeeting/state-of-lg-2019/issues/1 |
2019-02-27 22:25:50 | <boud> thanks |
2019-02-27 22:26:11 | <a-l-e> and i would suggest to use the attached repo for collecting the slides, like we did last year: |
2019-02-27 22:26:20 | <a-l-e> https://github.com/libregraphicsmeeting/state-of-lg-2019 |
2019-02-27 22:26:20 | <boud> golly |
2019-02-27 22:26:23 | <gingercoons_> houz: which only needs small amendments, like contact information and an update to the list of past LGMs |
2019-02-27 22:26:34 | <boud> I think that three slides per project will be too much, unless most projects don't reply |
2019-02-27 22:28:33 | <boud> a-l-e: maybe we should ask projects to send me chatty text too, so I can get to know the projects I'm not too familiar with and create a kind of narrative |
2019-02-27 22:29:18 | <a-l-e> boud, good idea... |
2019-02-27 22:29:29 | <pippin> boud: this is last years description of submmissions https://github.com/libregraphicsmeeting/state-of-lg-2018 - (mostly unchanged since the first state of libre graphisc) that asks for speaker notes and more, as well as file naming conventions |
2019-02-27 22:29:30 | <Aude_K8> @houz we already have the paypal button on the website. We can indead use the infos of 2016, we could have that online in the next days... |
2019-02-27 22:29:30 | <a-l-e> we can add more details on what projectname.txt should contain. |
2019-02-27 22:29:41 | <houz> gingercoons_: yes, but we need a decision if we want that at all. if we want to keep the amounts and the "benefits" |
2019-02-27 22:29:49 | <pippin> it also asks for *two* content slides, and one "title/project logo summary" slide |
2019-02-27 22:30:03 | <a-l-e> pippin, i've already copied it into https://github.com/libregraphicsmeeting/state-of-lg-2019 : - ) |
2019-02-27 22:30:23 | <houz> Aude_K8: agnès was contacted by opensuse who asked about details how to sponsor lgm |
2019-02-27 22:31:28 | <a-l-e> boud, we can enhance the sample .txt file: https://github.com/libregraphicsmeeting/state-of-lg-2019/blob/master/sample-project/sample-project.md |
2019-02-27 22:31:49 | <Aude_K8> @houz I don't know about that but I can speak with her (her child is sick since 10 days so that I do not get all infos...) |
2019-02-27 22:32:17 | <boud> a-l-e: I'll keep that open and think about it for a bit |
2019-02-27 22:32:25 | <pippin> and also note that if what is provided is a guideline, and the presenter will try to be faithful, but clarifying details might be better than a script to speak :) |
2019-02-27 22:32:25 | <a-l-e> it does not hurry (yet) |
2019-02-27 22:32:28 | <gingercoons_> houz: fair point. I suppose the value of the tiers is worth re-considering |
2019-02-27 22:32:50 | <boud> pippin: right |
2019-02-27 22:33:01 | <franktrampe> Quick question for K8 folks. Are you in a position to accept "global" funds past this year's event? |
2019-02-27 22:33:18 | <boud> a-l-e: right, too. By then I should have released Krita 4.2... And that seems ages right now! |
2019-02-27 22:34:12 | <Aude_K8> @franktrampe what do you mean whith "global funds"? |
2019-02-27 22:34:53 | <franktrampe> Money not spent on the local event. Money for travel reimbursements for 2020, for example. |
2019-02-27 22:35:35 | <Aude_K8> I have to check that but I think so. Since we did that for the travel reimbursments in Sevilla |
2019-02-27 22:35:47 | <pippin> franktrampe: have lgm ever had excess funds from year to year? this is news to me. |
2019-02-27 22:36:05 | <franktrampe> It will be news, but we will make it happen somehow. |
2019-02-27 22:36:06 | <houz> :-) |
2019-02-27 22:36:29 | <Aude_K8> I check and let you know in the next chat |
2019-02-27 22:36:33 | <franktrampe> Okay. |
2019-02-27 22:36:41 | <a-l-e> so, i don't need to come by bicycle? |
2019-02-27 22:37:06 | <Aude_K8> well you should, bicycle is nice in Saarbrücken:-) |
2019-02-27 22:37:22 | <Aude_K8> when do we do the next chat? |
2019-02-27 22:37:49 | <Aude_K8> next wednesday is not possible for me. In two weeks? |
2019-02-27 22:38:20 | <Aude_K8> that would be march 13th |
2019-02-27 22:38:23 | <Aude_K8> ? |
2019-02-27 22:38:25 | <pippin> ok - we could make a public statement on the website about the progress of the schedules (count of events of what type) |
2019-02-27 22:38:38 | <houz> i'd like to have the schedule out as soon as possible |
2019-02-27 22:38:38 | <Aude_K8> ok |
2019-02-27 22:38:39 | <a-l-e> it's a blog : - ) |
2019-02-27 22:38:57 | <houz> yeah, let's use the blog. is anyone willing to help writing stuff? |
2019-02-27 22:39:29 | <Aude_K8> @houz so a chat next week? Probably Soenke can do it even if I can't |
2019-02-27 22:39:46 | * ChanServ gives channel operator status to a-l-e |
2019-02-27 22:39:58 | <houz> otherwise i will be the local contact in the meeting |
2019-02-27 22:40:07 | * a-l-e has changed the topic to: http://libregraphicsmeeting.org/ - next LGM: 29 May to June 2 2019 in Saarbrücken - next org meeting: Wednesday March 13th, 21:00 CE(S)T |
2019-02-27 22:40:11 | <Aude_K8> and we can work the schedule over in the next days |
2019-02-27 22:40:18 | <houz> if it's just to look over the new schedule and accept it i feel qualified :-) |
2019-02-27 22:40:33 | <houz> Aude_K8: i will be sick on friday though |
2019-02-27 22:41:05 | <Aude_K8> @houw I am sick from friday until tuesday. Let's do it tomorrow |
2019-02-27 22:41:12 | <houz> :-) |
2019-02-27 22:41:45 | <Aude_K8> so next chat on march 6th? |
2019-02-27 22:41:54 | <franktrampe> Works for me. |
2019-02-27 22:41:59 | <houz> who can hand out credentials for blogging on the website? a-l-e? |
2019-02-27 22:42:08 | <houz> Aude_K8: +1 |
2019-02-27 22:44:18 | <a-l-e> houz, at least myself and soenke |
2019-02-27 22:44:30 | <houz> ok |
2019-02-27 22:45:05 | <Aude_K8> We are done for tonight? |
2019-02-27 22:45:11 | <houz> seems so |
2019-02-27 22:45:17 | <franktrampe> Let's do a quick review of the SPI thing. |
2019-02-27 22:45:24 | <houz> right |
2019-02-27 22:45:34 | <franktrampe> I'll put it to the mailing list later, but I'd appreciate a quick run-through with those present. |
2019-02-27 22:45:45 | <franktrampe> Per the e-mail, the arrangement isn't exclusive and has no flat fees. |
2019-02-27 22:46:01 | <houz> i am fine with applying. it's a no-strings-attached deal, so what is there to lose? |
2019-02-27 22:46:08 | <franktrampe> That's my thought on it. |
2019-02-27 22:46:53 | <franktrampe> We also need to pick a "liaison" for the relationship. It makes sense for me to serve in this capacity, but that is not covered by the resolution from 2017. |
2019-02-27 22:47:09 | <franktrampe> So we would also need to solicit other nominations and to vote on that. |
2019-02-27 22:47:37 | <houz> as long as it's not me i am fine with any volunteer ;-) |
2019-02-27 22:47:41 | <franktrampe> Hehe. |
2019-02-27 22:48:31 | <franktrampe> Alright. If there are no objections, I'll put this to the mailing list right now. |
2019-02-27 22:48:39 | <houz> let's put it on the list to vote with a 24h time frame or something like that. 36h max so that the proposal can be sent in time |
2019-02-27 22:48:57 | <franktrampe> Right. Forgot about that. |
2019-02-27 22:49:02 | <franktrampe> But we'll get it done somehow. |
2019-02-27 22:49:29 | <franktrampe> Folks here remember to participate so we don't have a "passed by a majority of the 2 people present" scenario. |
2019-02-27 22:49:45 | <franktrampe> Anyway, that's all I have. |
2019-02-27 22:49:48 | <franktrampe> Anybody else? |
2019-02-27 22:50:25 | <a-l-e> just put a "URGENT" in the subject... |
2019-02-27 22:50:47 | <a-l-e> or VOTE TODAY |
2019-02-27 22:50:51 | <franktrampe> Will do. |
2019-02-27 22:51:22 | <houz> !!!1!one!! |
2019-02-27 22:52:41 | <Aude_K8> ok then - I wish everyone good night. Bonne nuit! |
2019-02-27 22:53:02 | <houz> good night. my schedule says i need to sleep |
2019-02-27 22:53:12 | <Aude_K8> :-) |
2019-02-27 22:53:23 | <franktrampe> Good night. |
2019-02-27 22:53:36 | <a-l-e> bonne nuit | gute nacht | buona notte : - ) |
download raw logfile: LGM2019_meeting_log_2019_02_27.txt