2019-02-27 21:01:58 <franktrampe>	Hello, everybody.
2019-02-27 21:02:42 <franktrampe>	Just a reminder to skim the SPI letter so that we can talk about it later in the meeting.
2019-02-27 21:03:52 <houz>	hey
2019-02-27 21:04:34 <houz>	that one? Application_Letter_20190226_2.pdf
2019-02-27 21:04:56 <franktrampe>	Yes.
2019-02-27 21:05:42 <pippin>	hi
2019-02-27 21:05:57 <franktrampe>	There is an in-person SPI board meeting this Friday, and we can get on the agenda if we get the letter in by then.
2019-02-27 21:06:27 <houz>	sgtm
2019-02-27 21:07:10 <franktrampe>	The arrangement is totally non-exclusive, so, if it turns out to be non-useful, we simply don't use it. Sort of a win-win.
2019-02-27 21:07:49 <franktrampe>	I'd encourage others to read the SPI associated projects page and the draft letter so that we can hold a formal vote at the end of the meeting.
2019-02-27 21:08:32 <houz>	we also need some (corporate) sponsorship info on the website
2019-02-27 21:09:11 <franktrampe>	That brings up another question. Logistically speaking, did we ever reach an arrangement with K8 to handle global funds beyond this year?
2019-02-27 21:09:29 <a-l-e>	hi... i don't think that a formal vote should be done in irc. way too few people around.
2019-02-27 21:09:51 <franktrampe>	Yes, but nobody ever votes on the mailing list either.
2019-02-27 21:10:15 <a-l-e>	still, if there is a vote it should be first announced on the ML in advance.
2019-02-27 21:10:21 <franktrampe>	It seemed like it took a month of hammering last time we held an asynchronous vote.
2019-02-27 21:10:46 <franktrampe>	In this case, it's a highly inconsequential matter with no downside, and I did announce on the mailing list.
2019-02-27 21:11:10 <franktrampe>	I'm happy to hold another mailing list vote tomorrow, but we need at least to have a consensus here before we do that.
2019-02-27 21:12:01 <franktrampe>	For what it's worth, this is just an application. We are not obliged to accept the SPI partnership if the application is accepted.
2019-02-27 21:12:32 <franktrampe>	We might even hold that it's already approved under the vote to pursue the partnership.
2019-02-27 21:12:53 <franktrampe>	I just want to make sure that we don't miss this opportunity and let it slide another year.
2019-02-27 21:13:56 <houz>	i'm with frank there
2019-02-27 21:13:59 *	Aude_K8 (uid337527@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-wvuwmssnryhsyvsp) has joined
2019-02-27 21:14:11 <houz>	hey Aude_K8 
2019-02-27 21:14:20 <Aude_K8>	hi, sorry for the delay
2019-02-27 21:14:33 <franktrampe>	No worries. Just discussing the SPI application.
2019-02-27 21:15:22 <franktrampe>	We have a Friday deadline, and, out of caution, we want to hold a vote on the application and the liaison appointment.
2019-02-27 21:15:51 <franktrampe>	I'm happy with an IRC vote, but a-l-e would like to defer to the mailing list.
2019-02-27 21:16:01 <pippin>	Aude_K8: thanks a lot for putting together the draft schedule :)
2019-02-27 21:16:35 <franktrampe>	My proposal is that we hammer out something that we all like today and have a mailing list vote with a cut-off tomorrow at some time.
2019-02-27 21:17:00 <franktrampe>	But let's do local organization stuff first and get back to that later.
2019-02-27 21:18:10 <houz>	did everyone look over the proposed schedule?
2019-02-27 21:18:22 <houz>	link is https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TJF4_w09xCkG6aOfZQxsyw7WzYwrfGX6R9e9dnZXj2M/edit#gid=0
2019-02-27 21:18:42 <houz>	(yes, i pasted that in public irc on purpose)
2019-02-27 21:19:22 <pippin>	franktrampe: a formal decision by "lgm" is only really possible to do at lgm - besides todays meeting is about schedule planning and is not a generic lgm-meeting
2019-02-27 21:19:25 <a-l-e>	(btw, is the 30.5 an holiday in saarland, too?)
2019-02-27 21:19:35 <houz>	yes
2019-02-27 21:19:37 <Aude_K8>	the schedule is tight, but we have a lot of talks and workshops.
2019-02-27 21:20:05 <gingercoons_>	in general, it looks like a pretty nice schedule so far
2019-02-27 21:20:48 <pippin>	Aude_K8: what type thoughts have gone into ordering of talks/clusters of talks thus far?
2019-02-27 21:21:05 <a-l-e>	it's a bit hard to say, since i only see part of the title + the "track"...
2019-02-27 21:21:21 <a-l-e>	for the beginning, i'm not 100% sure that the first two talks are the best for starting.
2019-02-27 21:21:26 <houz>	we put the education ones to friday morning so that (in theory) teachers from the region could come
2019-02-27 21:21:32 <pippin>	a-l-e: agree
2019-02-27 21:21:43 <gingercoons_>	another +1 on a-l-e's point
2019-02-27 21:22:06 <Aude_K8>	and we have people who just can be there on one or two days, so we put them where it suits for them
2019-02-27 21:22:12 <gingercoons_>	usability is a newish topic for LGM, and it might be nice to put it a little later in the schedule
2019-02-27 21:22:14 <houz>	right
2019-02-27 21:22:36 <a-l-e>	we have everybody in the room for the state of the LG... it's one of the best spots and the talks (most of all the second one) seems a bit week to me.
2019-02-27 21:22:47 <Aude_K8>	and we tried to have talks with similer topics together, and no workshops /meetings with similar topics at the same time
2019-02-27 21:23:15 <a-l-e>	are all talks in there?
2019-02-27 21:23:24 <houz>	yes
2019-02-27 21:23:37 <houz>	besides one who never replied to mails
2019-02-27 21:23:44 <a-l-e>	probono?
2019-02-27 21:23:49 <a-l-e>	(appimage?)
2019-02-27 21:23:55 <houz>	no
2019-02-27 21:24:07 <a-l-e>	well, he was not refused, so it should be in, imo
2019-02-27 21:24:20 <a-l-e>	he is very late with replying, but he finally replied on monday.
2019-02-27 21:24:22 <Aude_K8>	dylan c
2019-02-27 21:24:25 <houz>	probono is sun morning
2019-02-27 21:24:29 <pippin>	a note that my own submisisons 'Commandlines, CMYK .. etc' would work better if it is *before* the 'GEGL and GIMP non-destructive editing' - which is formulated to discuss/elaborate discuss some of the future consequences of the talk
2019-02-27 21:25:06 <Aude_K8>	but there are also 3-4 other people where you were waiting for an answer, Ale. Did you get them?
2019-02-27 21:25:08 <a-l-e>	"liberate books" should be a LT, not a FT...
2019-02-27 21:25:29 <a-l-e>	some of them, yes. other no.
2019-02-27 21:25:37 <a-l-e>	it's marked in the google doc...
2019-02-27 21:25:54 <boud>	question: last year I did the State of Libre Graphics. Is there another speaker, or should I keep in mind that I might have to do it again?
2019-02-27 21:26:11 <pippin>	we should also have more than one lightning-talk session, and hope to get as many lightning talks submitted at the event as before.
2019-02-27 21:26:35 <a-l-e>	Aude_K8, one really failed ot reply, and it's the very first. i think that all other have had a reply.
2019-02-27 21:26:51 <houz>	boud: you did that exceptionally well, would you be willing to do it again?
2019-02-27 21:27:01 <houz>	pippin: there are 2 lt sessions
2019-02-27 21:27:09 <boud>	sure, but if there's a more regular person to do it, I don't want to put myself forward
2019-02-27 21:27:26 <pippin>	ah yes, there is one on saturday as well
2019-02-27 21:27:33 <a-l-e>	sat 1.6, "liberate  books": iirc, it has been confirmed as a LT, not a FT...
2019-02-27 21:27:35 <houz>	what do you mean, more regular? you are lgm inventory :-D
2019-02-27 21:28:31 <boud>	It was ages between Madrid and Sevilla, and in between I never could attend, as far as I remember.
2019-02-27 21:28:53 <gingercoons_>	is the distinction between workshop and BoF going to get re-introduced for the actual published schedule? for some of these, it's important for expectation management
2019-02-27 21:30:03 <houz>	Aude_K8 just called me, her computer is acting strangely, she's not ignoring us :-)
2019-02-27 21:30:53 <houz>	i would do the workshop/bof differentation, yes
2019-02-27 21:31:06 <houz>	but for scheduling them it's the same, right?
2019-02-27 21:31:26 <a-l-e>	should we put the comments in the sheet?
2019-02-27 21:31:43 <Aude_K8>	I am back :-)
2019-02-27 21:31:51 <gingercoons_>	I believe so. I just wanted us to be sure that it doesn't accidentally get collapsed during the translation from one spreadsheet to the next :)
2019-02-27 21:31:58 <houz>	that would be good. then we can go through it tomorrow and incorporate the changes
2019-02-27 21:32:05 <Aude_K8>	yes comments in the sheet would be helpful. Just let me do a copy
2019-02-27 21:33:16 <Aude_K8>	copy is there. So we can work in it
2019-02-27 21:33:39 <houz>	i also added comment columns to the tables
2019-02-27 21:35:44 <Aude_K8>	@a-l-e I have some questions to your feedbacks in the main sheet. Can we go through them to decide for propositions which are unclear? Like Number 10?
2019-02-27 21:35:56 <pippin>	perhaps there should be another/longer orga meeting than 50min just before the goodbye session?
2019-02-27 21:36:32 <a-l-e>	orga meeting at the end are not the best imo.
2019-02-27 21:36:53 <pippin>	franktrampe: have you submitted a workshop/bof for SPI membership?
2019-02-27 21:36:55 *	pippin hides
2019-02-27 21:37:17 <franktrampe>	No. I was planning to cover that at the organizational meeting.
2019-02-27 21:37:25 <gingercoons_>	maybe we could try to fit an additional org meeting into one of the lunch breaks?
2019-02-27 21:37:30 <franktrampe>	Fine with me.
2019-02-27 21:37:31 <Aude_K8>	can the orga meeting be during the lunch break
2019-02-27 21:38:12 <Aude_K8>	on which day will we have most of the persons? thursday? friday?
2019-02-27 21:38:45 <a-l-e>	Aude_K8, i just got a mail from 10 and he says that he will try to do a good talk : - )
2019-02-27 21:38:54 <Aude_K8>	If I remember right, a few people wrote they won't be there during the week-end
2019-02-27 21:38:59 <gingercoons_>	Aude_K8: I'd guess Friday
2019-02-27 21:39:25 <Aude_K8>	@a-l-e yes I spoke with him yesterday and he would really like to do one
2019-02-27 21:39:58 <a-l-e>	i think that the program he is creating is really interesting.
2019-02-27 21:40:01 <pippin>	but a orga/wrap-up/recruit helpers for next iteration, before the closing, for a shorter stretch than 50min, might be a good idea
2019-02-27 21:40:26 <pippin>	(in addition to a lunch organisation meeting)
2019-02-27 21:41:01 <a-l-e>	but he admitted that he was looking for contributors... and now does not have a good new plan yet... but you are confident and i'd really like him to present something good!
2019-02-27 21:41:54 <Aude_K8>	@pippin: you mean a meeting instead of sunday afternoon or one extra?
2019-02-27 21:42:21 <pippin>	Aude_K8: both
2019-02-27 21:42:33 <Aude_K8>	@a-l-e I can only say he is motivated. Houz knows more about his competences
2019-02-27 21:42:54 <Aude_K8>	@pippin ok I squeeze it somewhere in the schedule
2019-02-27 21:42:55 <a-l-e>	i've looked at his code and it looks really well written.
2019-02-27 21:43:13 <a-l-e>	and concerning the features, the screenshots are promising : - )
2019-02-27 21:43:31 <Aude_K8>	should we give him a chance with a full talk?
2019-02-27 21:44:12 <a-l-e>	he is confident to manage 15 to 20 mins.
2019-02-27 21:45:05 <Aude_K8>	For K8 it is fine for us if he does a full talk
2019-02-27 21:45:20 <houz>	i will try to drag #10 to the inkscape hackfest to get to know those people, maybe that will help shape his talk a little, too
2019-02-27 21:46:01 <Aude_K8>	ok for everyone?
2019-02-27 21:46:07 <houz>	yes for me
2019-02-27 21:46:15 <a-l-e>	yep
2019-02-27 21:46:26 <houz>	i added time constraints to the comments so we don't accidentally schedule talks where the speaker is not available
2019-02-27 21:47:08 <Aude_K8>	another question: #33 would really like to have a full talk and not 2 LT. What do you mean?
2019-02-27 21:47:19 <houz>	so 5 is a lt, that gives us a free slot either for an orga meeting or one of the two new ones
2019-02-27 21:48:01 <Aude_K8>	We planed #33 in the schedule as a full talk so it would not be a problem of time...
2019-02-27 21:48:24 <houz>	i would give him his full slot
2019-02-27 21:49:35 <Aude_K8>	someone against it?
2019-02-27 21:49:37 <a-l-e>	imo, he would be a good candidate for the starting talks.
2019-02-27 21:49:51 <houz>	jehan?
2019-02-27 21:49:55 <a-l-e>	yep
2019-02-27 21:49:56 <houz>	i mean, 33?
2019-02-27 21:50:51 <houz>	agreed
2019-02-27 21:51:09 <Aude_K8>	ok i noted that, we can switch the talks
2019-02-27 21:51:26 <Aude_K8>	He will be happy to do a full talk
2019-02-27 21:51:32 <houz>	we might put the whole usability cluster to another place then
2019-02-27 21:52:24 <Aude_K8>	ok, we can check that tomorrow
2019-02-27 21:53:10 <Aude_K8>	what do we do with the two people who did not answer (#3 and #19). Are they out?
2019-02-27 21:53:56 <a-l-e>	#3 does not have a realy proposal and did not reply to two emails... so i guess he is out...
2019-02-27 21:54:54 <Aude_K8>	#19 did not answer four emails. I guess he is out too
2019-02-27 21:55:03 <pippin>	are we sure that the people expecting replies does not have overly spam sensitive mail providers?
2019-02-27 21:55:22 <a-l-e>	#3 is gmail...
2019-02-27 21:56:08 <Aude_K8>	#19 got mails from me and they are sometimes in the spam. Can someone else try contact him one last time?
2019-02-27 21:56:28 <a-l-e>	for #19... it's an interesting project... but i don't really like the proposal he did.
2019-02-27 21:56:47 <Aude_K8>	but since the 66 other persons answered me, I am not sure that it was the problem...
2019-02-27 21:58:06 <houz>	i guess we have to make a cut somewhere, so i wouldn't wait any longer for a reply
2019-02-27 21:58:17 <Aude_K8>	+1
2019-02-27 21:58:42 <franktrampe>	It's not our last LGM after all.
2019-02-27 21:58:46 <pippin>	yes, and even without them we've got a quite packed and curated schedule coming along
2019-02-27 21:58:55 <houz>	indeed
2019-02-27 21:59:17 <Aude_K8>	next question is #32? Do we want to wait here?
2019-02-27 21:59:35 <Aude_K8>	Or say he can do an LT and 2020 there will be LGM again
2019-02-27 21:59:38 <Aude_K8>	?
2019-02-27 22:00:00 <a-l-e>	i'd like to wait there.
2019-02-27 22:00:24 <Aude_K8>	did you give him a deadline?
2019-02-27 22:01:31 <Aude_K8>	He is planed in the schedule so it is ok for me to give him one more week. But I would not like to wait longer
2019-02-27 22:01:47 <houz>	i pinged probono in #gimp
2019-02-27 22:02:05 <boud>	try #appimage :P
2019-02-27 22:02:26 <houz>	done :-)
2019-02-27 22:02:34 <a-l-e>	he was away for two weeks i guess...
2019-02-27 22:02:49 <a-l-e>	his first reply was yesterday...
2019-02-27 22:02:56 <boud>	spoke on #appimage today
2019-02-27 22:03:17 <Aude_K8>	what about #49?
2019-02-27 22:03:28 <houz>	let's give 33 a little extra time then
2019-02-27 22:03:34 <houz>	sorry, 32
2019-02-27 22:03:34 <a-l-e>	he made himself a well known person, and having chatted with him (a lot), i'm confident that he will propose something good.
2019-02-27 22:03:57 <houz>	a-l-e: who?
2019-02-27 22:03:59 <a-l-e>	49 has a new description and title.
2019-02-27 22:04:11 <a-l-e>	houz, 32
2019-02-27 22:04:29 <houz>	right, i just wasn't sure if you spoke about 32 or 49
2019-02-27 22:05:21 <Aude_K8>	so 32 gets more time. 49 sent a new proposition.
2019-02-27 22:06:11 <Aude_K8>	so 49 gets a full talk? Is it ok for everyone?
2019-02-27 22:06:17 <a-l-e>	49 has a high risk to be a weak talk... most of all because he does not feel confident in english (no idea what his real skills are)
2019-02-27 22:06:34 <a-l-e>	but he will bring a topic that will probably be interesting.
2019-02-27 22:06:55 <houz>	i'd like 49 in concert with the inkscape devs and a 1.0 release announcement :-D
2019-02-27 22:08:13 <Aude_K8>	or only an LT?
2019-02-27 22:08:19 <a-l-e>	he is trying hard to do something good. let's give him some karma : - )
2019-02-27 22:09:32 <houz>	+1
2019-02-27 22:11:29 <Aude_K8>	ok. 56-58: It stays we would get an updated version of the abstracts, but I do not remember why. Did anyone get something? Otherwise I would ask them again
2019-02-27 22:12:21 <houz>	i don't remember
2019-02-27 22:12:48 <gingercoons_>	was it because we asked for a change of format for one of the items?
2019-02-27 22:13:21 <Aude_K8>	Maybe... I get in touch with them
2019-02-27 22:13:49 <Aude_K8>	And last question: we have two new propositions: 68 + 69
2019-02-27 22:14:32 <Aude_K8>	Do we want to have them in if we have free time slots once we have worked over the schedule?
2019-02-27 22:15:56 <houz>	why not
2019-02-27 22:16:29 <pippin>	houz: because the deadline is long passeed..?
2019-02-27 22:17:46 <pippin>	while lightning talks are indeed still possible and desired (the form having been online makes it seem like we could be accepting though)
2019-02-27 22:17:59 <Aude_K8>	well, we still had the form on the website (now we shut it down). So people might not have seen that the deadline has passed
2019-02-27 22:18:39 <Aude_K8>	the form is not online anymore since a week. so it won't come more.
2019-02-27 22:19:44 <Aude_K8>	Otherwise we tell them that they can do a LT during LGM. And that they might get a time slot if someone is sick or does not come
2019-02-27 22:20:31 <gingercoons_>	I think it would be reasonable to just encourage them to attend and do LTs
2019-02-27 22:20:49 <Aude_K8>	the schedule will still be full if we do not accept them (and 68 has already a workshop)
2019-02-27 22:20:55 <gingercoons_>	saves a lot of schedule puzzling and still gives them encouragement to participate
2019-02-27 22:21:26 <Aude_K8>	@gingercoons +1 - and it is fair for people who participated on time
2019-02-27 22:22:34 <a-l-e>	so, boud, you you do the state of libre graphics?
2019-02-27 22:22:58 <Aude_K8>	For me for today all questions concerning programm and schedule are answered so we can continue to work on it. I will confirm the persons we wrote about tonight.
2019-02-27 22:23:10 <a-l-e>	... i've created a (growing) list of projects to be contacted... and i can help you get in touch with them.
2019-02-27 22:23:54 <houz>	before everyone leaves, we really need a decision about sponsoring information on the website. shall we just copy&paste from last years?
2019-02-27 22:23:56 <a-l-e>	nice, Aude_K8
2019-02-27 22:24:27 <boud>	a-l-e: if people want me to, sure. I will check out your list and it would be nice to have help contacting projects.
2019-02-27 22:24:33 <houz>	https://libregraphicsmeeting.org/2016/support-lgm/sponsorship/ might be a source to take from
2019-02-27 22:25:42 <a-l-e>	boud, the list is here: https://github.com/libregraphicsmeeting/state-of-lg-2019/issues/1
2019-02-27 22:25:50 <boud>	thanks
2019-02-27 22:26:11 <a-l-e>	and i would suggest to use the attached repo for collecting the slides, like we did last year:
2019-02-27 22:26:20 <a-l-e>	https://github.com/libregraphicsmeeting/state-of-lg-2019
2019-02-27 22:26:20 <boud>	golly
2019-02-27 22:26:23 <gingercoons_>	houz: which only needs small amendments, like contact information and an update to the list of past LGMs
2019-02-27 22:26:34 <boud>	I think that three slides per project will be too much, unless most projects don't reply
2019-02-27 22:28:33 <boud>	a-l-e: maybe we should ask projects to send me chatty text too, so I can get to know the projects I'm not too familiar with and create a kind of narrative
2019-02-27 22:29:18 <a-l-e>	boud, good idea...
2019-02-27 22:29:29 <pippin>	boud: this is last years description of submmissions https://github.com/libregraphicsmeeting/state-of-lg-2018 - (mostly unchanged since the first state of libre graphisc) that asks for speaker notes and more, as well as file naming conventions
2019-02-27 22:29:30 <Aude_K8>	@houz we already have the paypal button on the website. We can indead use the infos of 2016, we could have that online in the next days...
2019-02-27 22:29:30 <a-l-e>	we can add more details on what projectname.txt should contain.
2019-02-27 22:29:41 <houz>	gingercoons_: yes, but we need a decision if we want that at all. if we want to keep the amounts and the "benefits"
2019-02-27 22:29:49 <pippin>	it also asks for *two* content slides, and one "title/project logo summary" slide
2019-02-27 22:30:03 <a-l-e>	pippin, i've already copied it into https://github.com/libregraphicsmeeting/state-of-lg-2019 : - )
2019-02-27 22:30:23 <houz>	Aude_K8: agnès was contacted by opensuse who asked about details how to sponsor lgm
2019-02-27 22:31:28 <a-l-e>	boud, we can enhance the sample .txt file: https://github.com/libregraphicsmeeting/state-of-lg-2019/blob/master/sample-project/sample-project.md
2019-02-27 22:31:49 <Aude_K8>	@houz I don't know about that but I can speak with her (her child is sick since 10 days so that I do not get all infos...)
2019-02-27 22:32:17 <boud>	a-l-e: I'll keep that open and think about it for a bit
2019-02-27 22:32:25 <pippin>	and also note that if what is provided is a guideline, and the presenter will try to be faithful, but clarifying details might be better than a script to speak :)
2019-02-27 22:32:25 <a-l-e>	it does not hurry (yet)
2019-02-27 22:32:28 <gingercoons_>	houz: fair point. I suppose the value of the tiers is worth re-considering
2019-02-27 22:32:50 <boud>	pippin: right
2019-02-27 22:33:01 <franktrampe>	Quick question for K8 folks. Are you in a position to accept "global" funds past this year's event?
2019-02-27 22:33:18 <boud>	a-l-e: right, too. By then I should have released Krita 4.2... And that seems ages right now!
2019-02-27 22:34:12 <Aude_K8>	@franktrampe what do you mean whith "global funds"?
2019-02-27 22:34:53 <franktrampe>	Money not spent on the local event. Money for travel reimbursements for 2020, for example.
2019-02-27 22:35:35 <Aude_K8>	I have to check that but I think so. Since we did that for the travel reimbursments in Sevilla
2019-02-27 22:35:47 <pippin>	franktrampe: have lgm ever had excess funds from year to year? this is news to me.
2019-02-27 22:36:05 <franktrampe>	It will be news, but we will make it happen somehow.
2019-02-27 22:36:06 <houz>	:-)
2019-02-27 22:36:29 <Aude_K8>	I check and let you know in the next chat
2019-02-27 22:36:33 <franktrampe>	Okay.
2019-02-27 22:36:41 <a-l-e>	so, i don't need to come by bicycle?
2019-02-27 22:37:06 <Aude_K8>	well you should, bicycle is nice in Saarbrücken:-)
2019-02-27 22:37:22 <Aude_K8>	when do we do the next chat?
2019-02-27 22:37:49 <Aude_K8>	next wednesday is not possible for me. In two weeks?
2019-02-27 22:38:20 <Aude_K8>	that would be march 13th
2019-02-27 22:38:23 <Aude_K8>	?
2019-02-27 22:38:25 <pippin>	ok - we could make a public statement on the website about the progress of the schedules (count of events of what type)
2019-02-27 22:38:38 <houz>	i'd like to have the schedule out as soon as possible
2019-02-27 22:38:38 <Aude_K8>	ok
2019-02-27 22:38:39 <a-l-e>	it's a blog : - )
2019-02-27 22:38:57 <houz>	yeah, let's use the blog. is anyone willing to help writing stuff?
2019-02-27 22:39:29 <Aude_K8>	@houz  so a chat next week? Probably Soenke can do it even if I can't
2019-02-27 22:39:46 *	ChanServ gives channel operator status to a-l-e
2019-02-27 22:39:58 <houz>	otherwise i will be the local contact in the meeting
2019-02-27 22:40:07 *	a-l-e has changed the topic to: http://libregraphicsmeeting.org/ - next LGM: 29 May to June 2 2019 in Saarbrücken - next org meeting: Wednesday March 13th, 21:00 CE(S)T
2019-02-27 22:40:11 <Aude_K8>	and we can work the schedule over in the next days
2019-02-27 22:40:18 <houz>	if it's just to look over the new schedule and accept it i feel qualified :-)
2019-02-27 22:40:33 <houz>	Aude_K8: i will be sick on friday though
2019-02-27 22:41:05 <Aude_K8>	@houw I am sick from friday until tuesday. Let's do it tomorrow
2019-02-27 22:41:12 <houz>	:-)
2019-02-27 22:41:45 <Aude_K8>	so next chat on march 6th?
2019-02-27 22:41:54 <franktrampe>	Works for me.
2019-02-27 22:41:59 <houz>	who can hand out credentials for blogging on the website? a-l-e?
2019-02-27 22:42:08 <houz>	Aude_K8: +1
2019-02-27 22:44:18 <a-l-e>	houz, at least myself and soenke
2019-02-27 22:44:30 <houz>	ok
2019-02-27 22:45:05 <Aude_K8>	We are done for tonight?
2019-02-27 22:45:11 <houz>	seems so
2019-02-27 22:45:17 <franktrampe>	Let's do a quick review of the SPI thing.
2019-02-27 22:45:24 <houz>	right
2019-02-27 22:45:34 <franktrampe>	I'll put it to the mailing list later, but I'd appreciate a quick run-through with those present.
2019-02-27 22:45:45 <franktrampe>	Per the e-mail, the arrangement isn't exclusive and has no flat fees.
2019-02-27 22:46:01 <houz>	i am fine with applying. it's a no-strings-attached deal, so what is there to lose?
2019-02-27 22:46:08 <franktrampe>	That's my thought on it.
2019-02-27 22:46:53 <franktrampe>	We also need to pick a "liaison" for the relationship. It makes sense for me to serve in this capacity, but that is not covered by the resolution from 2017.
2019-02-27 22:47:09 <franktrampe>	So we would also need to solicit other nominations and to vote on that.
2019-02-27 22:47:37 <houz>	as long as it's not me i am fine with any volunteer ;-)
2019-02-27 22:47:41 <franktrampe>	Hehe.
2019-02-27 22:48:31 <franktrampe>	Alright. If there are no objections, I'll put this to the mailing list right now.
2019-02-27 22:48:39 <houz>	let's put it on the list to vote with a 24h time frame or something like that. 36h max so that the proposal can be sent in time
2019-02-27 22:48:57 <franktrampe>	Right. Forgot about that.
2019-02-27 22:49:02 <franktrampe>	But we'll get it done somehow.
2019-02-27 22:49:29 <franktrampe>	Folks here remember to participate so we don't have a "passed by a majority of the 2 people present" scenario.
2019-02-27 22:49:45 <franktrampe>	Anyway, that's all I have.
2019-02-27 22:49:48 <franktrampe>	Anybody else?
2019-02-27 22:50:25 <a-l-e>	just put a "URGENT" in the subject...
2019-02-27 22:50:47 <a-l-e>	or VOTE TODAY
2019-02-27 22:50:51 <franktrampe>	Will do.
2019-02-27 22:51:22 <houz>	!!!1!one!!
2019-02-27 22:52:41 <Aude_K8>	ok then - I wish everyone good night. Bonne nuit!
2019-02-27 22:53:02 <houz>	good night. my schedule says i need to sleep
2019-02-27 22:53:12 <Aude_K8>	:-)
2019-02-27 22:53:23 <franktrampe>	Good night.
2019-02-27 22:53:36 <a-l-e>	bonne nuit | gute nacht | buona notte : - )